Search
Search

Ethics of Rationing End-of-Life Care: Can We Ever Agree?

Author

sysadmin

Publish date

Tag(s): Archive post Legacy post
Topic(s): End of Life Care Health Care

A PBS forum with Arthur Caplan and others asked the BIG question about rationing end-of-life care, and perhaps rationing in general: can we as a society ever agree as to what the rational goals of health care can be at the end of life?

To hear Caplan’s position, as well as the proponents and opponents of his view, watch the video below.

Summer Johnson, PhD

Related posts

Making a Case for Appropriate and Humane Treatment of Hamas Belligerents in Israel

This editorial can be found in the February 2024 issue of the American Journal of Bioethics. Three thousand belligerents, mostly belonging to the military arm of Hamas, stormed Southern Israel on October 7th, 2023. Along with 3,000 rockets fired at Israel from Gaza, these belligerents invaded roughly 22 Israeli villages, towns, and military posts. As […]

Chemical Restraints for Obstetric Violence: Anesthesiology Professionals, Moral Courage, and the Prevention of Forced and Coerced Surgeries

This editorial can be found in the February 2024 issue of the American Journal of Bioethics. Once anesthetized, patients are inherently “compliant” with surgical interventions because they can no longer intervene on their own behalf. In their target article, Minkoff et al. reasonably predict that the loss of a legal right to abortion will likely lead […]

Ethical Mechanisms for Increasing Compliance with Institutional End-of-Life Policies 

Over 200 million people globally have legal access to some form of aid in dying. In 2008, Washington became the second of eleven U.S. jurisdictions offering Medical Aid-in-Dying (“MAiD”). Among these jurisdictions, Washington, California, and New Mexico each require at least some healthcare entities to make their MAiD policies publicly available via their website. Most […]

Patient Advocacy in Practice

I was in a meeting recently, and a colleague discussed his conversation with a researcher. The researcher voiced his concerns about the involvement of patient advocates during the grant review process. He didn’t think patient advocates should be a part of the process because “they don’t understand the science, what incremental steps, or high impact […]

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Privacy Policy. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

close