Get Published | Subscribe | About | Write for Our Blog    

Posted on June 1, 2018 at 2:15 PM

& Choices and Legal Voice have filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of four
Idaho women. The lawsuit, Almerico et al. v. State of Idaho et al,
challenges the constitutionality of an Idaho statute that invalidates a
person’s advance directive for end-of-life care if they have been diagnosed as

Idaho’s Medical Consent and Natural Death Act recognizes:
“…the fundamental right of competent persons to control the decisions relating
to the rendering of their medical care, including the decision to have
life-sustaining procedures withheld or withdrawn.” But the law states that if a person has “been diagnosed as
pregnant, this Directive shall have no force during the course of [their]

This law disregards a person’s
wishes for the care they want or do not want to receive. As such, Compassion
& Choices and Legal Voice argue that Idaho’s law violates people’s
constitutional rights to legal equality and to direct their own medical care.

All four plaintiffs are women
of childbearing age and have completed advance directives. Some of their health
care directives include provisions about pregnancy and some do not, reflecting
their different expectations about their medical care if they become terminally
ill while pregnant. 

“This law blatantly
discriminates against women who are pregnant, plain and simple,” said plaintiff
Chelsea Gaona-Lincoln, a behavioral therapist who is pregnant with her first
child and lives in Caldwell, Idaho. “Of course, I hope my
baby’s birth goes smoothly and we both are healthy after it’s over. But God
forbid, if I get a terminal illness during my pregnancy, I do not want the
state interfering in my family’s end-of-life care decisions.”

The other three plaintiffs
are Anna Almerico, Micaela de Loyola-Carkin and Hannah Sharp, all of whom live
in Boise, Idaho. The lawsuit defendants are the Idaho
Secretary of State
 Lawrence Denney, Idaho Attorney
 Lawrence Wasden and the Idaho Health and
Welfare Department Director
 Russell Barron.

“Idaho’s refusal to recognize
the right of all people, regardless of gender, to make decisions as to their
own health care violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the
United States Constitution,” says the complaint filed in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Idaho by the Boise office of Perkins Coie LLP. “Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek a
judgment declaring unconstitutional the portion of the law that automatically
invalidates a woman’s health care directive if she is diagnosed as pregnant.”

The complaint also asks the
court to permanently prohibit Defendants from “nullifying otherwise valid
health care directives on the basis of pregnancy” and from “stating that
[health care directives] will not be enforced or otherwise considered valid
during pregnancy.”

“The State of Idaho is
forcing pregnant women to receive treatment until the end of their pregnancies,
regardless of their wishes in their health care directives, their physicians’
instructions or recommendations, or any other circumstances,” said Kevin Díaz, national director of legal advocacy for Compassion
& Choices
. “It violates the right to privacy in making medical
decisions and treats women of childbearing age differently than other people by
eliminating the validity of their health care directives if they are pregnant.”

“People do not lose their
civil rights when they become pregnant. But that’s exactly what is at stake
here. Idaho’s discriminatory law purports to take away a pregnant person’s
decision-making power, even when they have explicitly detailed the care they wish,
or do not wish, to receive,” said Sara L. Ainsworth, Advocacy Director of Legal Voice. “The
tragedy that families face when a pregnant loved one is in a terminally ill
condition is only heightened when that loved one’s health care decisions are
ignored. This lawsuit seeks to vindicate people’s rights to make their own
decisions about their health care, regardless of gender.”

There is no medical practice
of keeping terminally ill, unconscious women alive to bring their pregnancies
to term. In fact, the state of Texas tried to do it in the tragic case of Marlise Munoz, whom doctors had declared brain dead. But a
court ultimately ordered the hospital to follow her family’s wish to end
life-sustaining treatment, in part because there was no medical evidence that
her 14-week-old fetus could actually survive to term.

The full complaint is posted

Comments are closed.