Get Published | Subscribe | About | Write for Our Blog    

Posted on May 28, 2019 at 11:26 AM

This article quotes me on some of the implications of Warren v. Dinter on curbside consults and independent medical examiners. 

Last month, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a treatment relationship is not a prerequisite for imposing medical malpractice liability.

I explore lessons from the case in more detail in a forthcoming article in The ASCO Post: “Curbside Consults: New Liability Risks to Avoid When You Are Not the Patient’s Physician.”

Comments are closed.