Posted on August 6, 2019 at 4:19 PM
Kathy Brandt, a leader in the hospice and palliative care movement in the United States, died on August 4. She was 53 and had been diagnosed with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), a rare, highly aggressive form of ovarian cancer, in January.
Brandt was an expert advisor to The Hastings Center project that produced the revised and expanded second edition of The Hastings Center Guidelines for Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment and Care Near the End of Life. As director of that project, I met and conferred with Brandt, then a senior vice president at the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. She was a generous colleague who graciously shared her deep knowledge of hospice practice and policy. She recently completed the fourth edition of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care, a crucial resource for the field.
As a final contribution to the field, Brandt (above, left) and her wife, Kim Acquaviva (above, right), a professor of nursing at University of Virginia and an expert on hospice for LGBTQ+ patients and families, regularly posted on Twitter and Facebook about their family’s end-of-life experiences. These experiences including Brandt’s early decision to forgo oncological interventions such as chemotherapy or radiation given her poor prognosis and to focus on palliative treatment to manage symptoms. Too often, we still frame this decision as a trade-off between “quantity” and “quality,” as though opting for interventions for metastatic cancer translates into more time – or at least “fighting” for it – while forgoing these interventions means less time. As New York Times columnist Jane Brody wrote this week, reflecting empirical findings, for some cancers more interventions produce neither more time nor better time. We know these findings – yet Brandt and Acquaviva, two deeply knowledgeable experts, described oncologists who questioned Brandt’s decision and had difficulty imagining not “trying,” even given a grim prognosis.
JoNel Aleccia of Kaiser Health News reported on Brandt and Acquaviva’s narrative in May and on Brandt’s death this week. This end-of-life story included the financial consequences of terminal illness. A GoFundMe campaign was created for the couple and their 19-year-old son to alleviate their loss of income, medical bills, and funeral costs at a time when the couple was paying for college and other typical midlife expenses.
Brandt and Acquaviva also took part in a Kaiser Health News expert panel on LGBTQ+ end-of-life care; watch the video.
Nancy Berlinger is a research scholar at The Hastings Center.
The post Live-Tweeting About Dying: Last Lessons from Kathy Brandt appeared first on The Hastings Center.
Comments are closed.