American Journal of Bioethics.

Changing the Conversation About Brain Death

We seek to change the conversation about brain death by highlighting the distinction between brain death as a biological concept versus brain death as a legal status. The fact that brain death does not cohere with any biologically plausible definition of death has been known for decades. Nevertheless, this fact has not threatened the acceptance of brain death as a legal status that permits individuals to be treated as if they are dead. The similarities between “legally dead” and “legally blind” demonstrate how we may legitimately choose bright-line legal definitions that do not cohere with biological reality. Not only does this distinction bring conceptual coherence to the conversation about brain death, but it has practical implications as well. Once brain death is recognized as a social construction not grounded in biological reality, we create the possibility of changing the social construction in ways that may better serve both organ donors and recipients alike.

View Full Text

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.

Volume 14, Issue 8
August 2014

Target Articles.

Whither Brain Death? James L. Bernat
Changing the Conversation About Brain Death Robert D. Truog & Franklin G. Miller

Editorial.

AJOB 2.0: Taking Bioethics to a New Level David Magnus, Kayhan Parsi & Richard Sharp