Blog RSS Blog.

Author Archive: Blog Editor

12/28/2016

Modern Pregnancies and (Im)Perfect Babies

by Stephanie A. Kraft, JD

The modern experience of pregnancy is distinctly “not your mother’s pregnancy”. Ever-expanding options for carrier, prenatal, and newborn screening offer today’s pregnant women countless choices when it comes to genetic testing—choices that were unheard of, even unfathomable, just a generation ago.

Prenatal screening and diagnosis have long challenged the tension between individual reproductive autonomy and society-wide respect for persons with disabilities. New genetic and genomic technologies have the potential to either heighten or relieve this tension, depending (in part) on how they are implemented. Shakespeare argues that the advent of prenatal whole genome sequencing can remind us that “everyone is potentially disabled” due to one genetic mutation or another, but at the same time he cautions that the widespread use of this technology may lead parents to focus on individual genetic imperfections rather than accepting their children as the “flawed, vulnerable, limited and mortal” people that they are.…

Full Article

12/20/2016

BioethicsTV (November 2016) Continued: Further commentary on Informed Consent

by Abhimanyu Amarnani

Chicago Med (Season 2, Episode 8, 11/10/16).

A December 1st BIOETHICSTV blog post briefly mentioned, Season 2, Episode 8 of Chicago Med. The post notes that the episode dealt with the issues of informed consent in brief. I felt that a more in-depth discussion of these issues was warranted. Consider the storylines in the episode: A young girl with a developmental disorder needs cardiac surgery. Her condition forces her mother to question whether the girl can make decisions for surgery. Second, Nurse April was coughing at the end of episode 7, and viewers learned that she is diagnosed with multidrug resistant tuberculosis (TB).…

Full Article

This entry was posted in Featured Posts, HIV/AIDS, Organ Transplant & Donation, Public Health and tagged . Posted by Blog Editor. Bookmark the permalink.

12/01/2016

Moral Distress in Clinical Ethics: Expanding the Concept

by Alyssa M. Burgart & Katherine E. Kruse

As physician ethicists, we often receive consultations where there is no clear ethical question, but rather, discomfort around value judgments. We have struggled to articulate the meaning of colleagues’ morally uncomfortable experiences. The traditional definition of moral distress is quite restrictive and offers no vocabulary for our observations. Clinicians know something is wrong and that it might be of a moral nature. However, they don’t know the “right” thing to do, and the institution isn’t preventing them from acting. In our practice, most ethics consults do not have “right” answers, but they almost universally have people struggling with moral unease.…

Full Article

This entry was posted in Clinical Ethics, Featured Posts. Posted by Blog Editor. Bookmark the permalink.

11/09/2016

Bioethics faces a rocky but navigable road

by Arthur Caplan, Ph.D.

Academic bioethics has never been popular with Republicans.  Libertarians dislike academic bioethics because it seems too elitist and anti-free market.  Religious thinkers worry it is technocratic, soulless and crassly utilitarian.  Now with Trumpism add a populist disdain for expertise, experts and the scientific method and you have a stew that means few of you reading this will find a rapt audience in Washington for many years to come.

Trump needs to appease the paleocons and religious righ to get things done.  This makes it likely that bioethics will be swept back into the culture wars of the Bush era — Abortion.…

Full Article

10/24/2016

Autonomy by Default

by Cass R. Sunstein, JD

Default rules, taken as such, do not intrude on autonomy, even if they influence people without persuading them. If default rules give people certain rights automatically (such as the right to free speech), they promote autonomy for just that reason. And to the extent that default rules give people the freedom to focus on their most pressing concerns, and thus eliminate a kind of “bandwidth tax,” they increase autonomy as well. When default rules compromise autonomy, it is not because they are default rules; it is because they invade, or take, certain rights or interests without people’s explicit consent.…

Full Article

08/19/2016

Owning Medical Professionalism

by Jon C. Tilburt, MD & Richard R. Sharp, PhD

Discontinuity, handoffs, and shiftwork have infiltrated the fabric of healthcare. These changes, made in the name of patient safety, may have the unintended effect of reducing residency training to little more than a terrible shift job, disconnected from the professional ethos so critical to the practice of medicine.

In their piece in AJOB this month Dubov and colleagues highlight several problems with resident duty hour restrictions. They postulate that cultivating a vocabulary of personal and professional “ownership” could counteract the detrimental effects of those restrictions. Their facility with the duty-hours literature is impressive and they rightly note how duty hour restrictions may have especially deleterious effects on surgical training.…

Full Article

07/13/2016

Reason, Emotion, and Implanted Devices

by John D. Lantos, MD

Pullman and Hodgkinson present a case that, it seems, should have been an easy one. A competent adult makes a simple request to discontinue a medical therapy. Further, it was a therapy that he’d already tried so personal experience informed his preference to discontinue therapy. His request was repeated over time. He was determined to have adequate decisional capacity. So why did both the physicians and the bioethicists consider this to be a difficult case?

There are certain cases that lead to such dilemmas. They are cases in which emotions tug us in one direction and reason tugs in another.…

Full Article

This entry was posted in Clinical Ethics, Featured Posts, Philosophy & Ethics. Posted by Blog Editor. Bookmark the permalink.

05/31/2016

Response to Zika and the Olympics Letter

The following letter was received by bioethics.net in response to our link to a letter written by professionals urging the Olympics to be postponed this year because of the threat of Zika.


 by Ralph R. Frerichs

It may seem strange to hear WHO’s Margaret Chan or CDC’s Thomas Frieden quickly reject any suggestion that the Olympics be postponed or moved to avoid expanding Brazil’s Zika epidemic, not even offering caveats of future research findings.  Yet all this has occurred before, and not that many years ago.

When the world’s greatest cholera epidemic first appeared in Haiti in 2010, brought by UN peacekeepers from Nepal, the UN, WHO and CDC all were united in avoiding discovery of the source. …

Full Article

This entry was posted in Featured Posts, Politics, Public Health, Sports Ethics and tagged , . Posted by Blog Editor. Bookmark the permalink.

05/25/2016

The Potential for Infrastructure Benefits and the Responsiveness Requirement

by David Wendler, PhD

The distribution of resources around the globe is characterized by staggering inequalities and inequities, with the result that individuals in lower income countries have greater disease burden and shorter lives than individuals in high-income countries. Commentators on research ethics are well aware of this concern and have searched for ways to design and conduct clinical trials to help to address it. Much of this work focuses on how to protect individuals and communities in lower income countries from exploitation. In particular, what requirements are needed to prevent clinical investigators and funders from wrongly using participants and communities in lower income countries to develop new interventions for the benefit of high-income countries?…

Full Article

This entry was posted in Clinical Trials & Studies, Featured Posts, Health Disparities. Posted by Blog Editor. Bookmark the permalink.

05/19/2016

In Memoriam: Vivian Weil, PhD (1929-2016)

by John Douard, JD, PhD

I just found out that an old friend of mine, Vivian Weil, died earlier this month. This is very sad news for me personally, but also for the philosophical community because Vivian was one of the most important philosophers in the world, especially for those who believe philosophy can and should have an impact on the way we live our lives. Vivian and Nancy Cartwright were the first two students to receive a PhD from the University of Illinois at Chicago (then called Chicago Circle) from the philosophy department, which then and now was one of the best philosophy departments in the country.…

Full Article

This entry was posted in Featured Posts and tagged , . Posted by Blog Editor. Bookmark the permalink.