Vol. 3 No. 4 | October 2012

Vol. 3 No. 4 | October 2012

ISBN: 2150-7740

target articles

Techniques for achieving moral enhancement will modify brain processes to produce what is alleged to be more moral conduct. Neurophilosophy and neuroethics must ponder what “moral enhancement” could possibly be, if possible at all. Objections to the very possibility of moral enhancement, raised from various philosophical and neuroscientific standpoints, fail to justify skepticism, but they do ...

Click for More

Open Peer Commentary

The Necessity of Objective Standards for Moral Enhancement Filippo Santoni de Sio, Hannah Maslen & Nadira Faulmüller
On Moral Enhancement William Simkulet
Moral Enhancement for Antisocial Behavior? An Uneasy Relationship Dorothee Horstkötter, Ron Berghmans & Guido de Wert
Moral Frankensteins Thom Brooks

Brain imaging provides ever more sensitive measures of structure and function relevant to human psychology and has revealed correlates for virtually every psychiatric disorder. Yet it plays no accepted role in psychiatric diagnosis beyond ruling out medical factors such as tumors or traumatic brain injuries. Why is brain imaging not used in the diagnosis of primary psychiatric disorders, such as d...

Click for More

Recent evidence from the neurosciences and cognitive sciences provides some support for a narrative theory of self-understanding. However, it also suggests that narrative self-understanding is unlikely to be accurate, and challenges its claims to truth. This article examines a range of this empirical evidence, explaining how it supports a narrative theory of self-understanding while raising questi...

Click for More