External Link - Source: Guardian
The leading scientific journal Nature argued yesterday for increased
safeguards for future cloning papers, in response to the scandal
surrounding Woo Suk Hwang's faked cloning research.
Bioethics News.The leading scientific journal Nature argued yesterday for increased
safeguards for future cloning papers, in response to the scandal
surrounding Woo Suk Hwang's faked cloning research.
#Bioethics News: An article in the @WSJ discusses how #Google uses algorithms to tweak your search results and shape what you see https://t.co/7SfkNkEaka
#Bioethics News: The results of a recent study challenge some of the most common practices in healthcare: for people with severe but stable heart disease, costly stent procedures and bypass operations may in fact be unnecessary https://t.co/6D6P9PWEow
Bioethics News: A form of #CRISPR called Cas13 targets specific regions of RNA instead of DNA. Since many viruses package their genetic instructions in RNA, this technology could potentially be used to treat viral illnesses https://t.co/dNL3ZmNUN1
#Bioethics News: The French ban on direct-to-consumer genetic testing, such as from companies like 23andMe, has activists fighting for the right to know their own DNA https://t.co/tOLRxj7JR4
#Bioethics News: It's been a year since He Jiankui used #CRISPR to edit the genomes of two human embryos. Since then, scientists around the globe have been wrestling with the question of how to responsibly use the technology https://t.co/TzTFys6R36
Bioethics TV