Tag: clinical research
Published Articles (10)
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 10 Issue 7 - Jul 2010
Review of The Ethics of Consent, eds. Franklin G. Miller and Alan Wertheimer Jessica W. Berg
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 8 Issue 3 - Mar 2008
A Plea for Pragmatism in Clinical Research Ethics David H Brendel
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 7 Issue 6 - Jun 2007
Is it Sound Public Policy to Let the Terminally Ill Access Experimental Medical Innovations? Arthur L. Caplan
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 7 Issue 3 - Mar 2007
Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations Celia B. Fisher
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 6 Issue 3 - May 2006
Promoting the Participation of Minorities in Research Mandy Garber
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 5 Issue 3 - May 2005
A Review of: ?Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Robert A. Crouch, John D. Arras, et al., eds. 2004? Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary Howard Mann
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 4 Issue 1 - Jan 2004
Author Responds to Letters on "Children in Clinical Research: A Conflict of Moral Values" (AJOB 3:1) Vera Hassner Sharav
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 4 Issue 1 - Jan 2004
Omitted Considerations and Populations: A Response to "Should Children Decide Whether They Are Enrolled in Nonbeneficial Research?" by David Wendler and Seema Shah (AJOB 3:4) Antal E. Solyom
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 3 Issue 1 - Mar 2003
Children in Clinical Research: A Conflict of Moral Values Vera Hassner Sharav
American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 1 Issue 2 - Jun 2001
Money for Research Participation: Does It Jeopardize Informed Consent? Christine Grady
News (1)
April 18, 2012 5:58 pm
Bioethicists urge less regulatory burden for low-risk comparative effectiveness research (EurekAlert)
In an opinion article published in this week’s theme edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association focusing on comparative effectiveness research, a team of Johns Hopkins University bioethicists argues forcefully for streamlining federal restrictions on at least some low-risk clinical comparative effectiveness research, instead of easing them – as is now proposed – solely for low-risk social and behavior research involving surveys, interviews and focus groups.