Tag: NIH

Blog Posts (3)

August 19, 2015

NIH Budget Increase on One Hand, Fewer Outputs on Another

<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;"><span style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;">I love reading the news posts in </span><em style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;">Nature </em><span style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;">and </span><em style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;">Science</em><span style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;"> that I receive in the journal’s eAlerts. This past month was most interesting because there were two news posts that I thought were actually a bit contradicting. The first one titled “Spending bills put NIH on track for the biggest raise in 12 years” was published in July of this year and explains how both houses of congress want to increase the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) annual budget (Kaiser, 2015a). The Presidential branch wants to give the NIH a 1 billion dollar increase while just recently, a Senate panel approved a 2 billion increase. The article also goes onto say that certain programs have been given priority such as the Alzheimer’s research and others like the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality will receive cuts. Needless to say, I am sure that biomedical and behavioral scientists throughout the country are probably ecstatic. But is this really a good thing?</span></p> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;"><span style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;">The other news blurb I read was titled an “A for effort, C for impact from U.S. biomedical research, study concludes” also written by the same author (Kaiser, 2015b). In this article, Jocelyn Kaiser reports the results of a study by two research scientists Dr. Arturo Casadevall and Anthony Bowen who examined publications in the PubMed database and the number of authors, along with the approval of new drugs and their work was published in the journal </span><em style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)</em><span style="font-size: 11.1999998092651px; line-height: 19.0400009155273px;">. The researchers compared publication outputs with the number of new molecules approved by the U.S. government. What they found was not too surprising. </span></p> <p><span style="color: #34405b; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 19.0400009155273px; font-size: 12px;"><strong>The Alden March Bioethics Institute offers a Master of Science in Bioethics, a</strong> </span><strong style="color: #34405b; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 19.0400009155273px; font-size: 12px;">Doctorate of Professional Studies in Bioethics, and Graduate Certificates in Clinical Ethics and Clinical Ethics Consultation. For more information on AMBI's online graduate programs, please visit our <a style="color: #000099; text-decoration: underline;" href="/Academic/bioethics/index.cfm">website</a>.</strong></p>
September 21, 2009

NIH Stem Cell Working Group Chaired By Card-Carrying Bioethicist?

With Jeffrey Botkin appointed as the Chair of the Working Group for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Eligibility Review, can anyone be surprised that the committee is also comprised of two other card-carrying bioethicists: Dena S.…

October 17, 2007

NIH director publicly opposes Bush position on embryonic stem cell research

Via Art Caplan comes this item from Mary Ann Akers’ WaPo blog “The Sleuth” in which she highlights Elias Zerhouni’s statements of support for embryonic stem cell research in a recent NIH magazine.…

Published Articles (1)

American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 6 Issue 3 - May 2006

Promoting the Participation of Minorities in Research

News (2)

April 25, 2012 11:35 am

Embryonic Stem Cells in Court Again (The Scientist)

National Institutes of Health guidelines released in 2009 lifted the Bush-era restrictions on hESC research, but were met with a lawsuit by adult stem cell researchers that August. A preliminary injunction by the US District Court in Washington, DC, prevented NIH funding for hESCs in August 2010. Just 2 weeks later, the US Court of Appeals for the District Court stayed the injunction, then overturned it for good in April 2011—3 months before the appeals court dismissed the lawsuit altogether. Now, the case is once again in appeals court, and current arguments focus on whether this earlier decision is binding.

April 12, 2012 9:58 pm

NIH Unperturbed by New Way of Peering Into Personal Genomic Data (Science Insider)

In a provocative paper published this week, researchers say they have figured out a way to link a person’s DNA to their anonymous genetic data in a certain kind of public research database. But the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which hosts one of the largest such databases, says it’s not taking any new steps to prevent someone from using the method to breach privacy. That contrasts with NIH’s response 4 years ago, when a similar study prompted the agency to pull genetic data from its public Web sites.