There is tension in bioethics between two strains of pragmatism. The most prominent strain, following John Dewey, proposes a content-rich ethos of controlled, collective moral inquiry. A second strain, descending from Charles Peirce and Josiah Royce, favors an open-ended approach where diverging moral communities evolve without extensive inter-communal oversight. This essay defends the second strain. The Deweyan approach, I argue, exhibits a problematic quasi-foundationalist character insofar as it canonizes a dubious constellation of “liberal” political values and seeks to establish these values by interposing a consensus of moral experts where genuine inter-communal dialogue, and compromise, would be more fruitful. I hold that the alternative approach of Peirce and Royce is preferable, and truer to the fundamental commitments of classical American pragmatism. Recognizing the epistemic fallibility of various content-rich moral-political formulations, Peirce and Royce hope to cultivate and sustain moral inquiry by allowing each moral community (1) to generate and test its own moral system (as long as it does so peaceably) and (2) to freely make or refuse to make collaborative arrangements with other moral communities. This approach is illustrated in a brief discussion of the Oregon Medicaid Experiment.

Students' Meningitis Shots Should Be Required
Americans hate to be told what to do, but we hate losing our kids more.

by Arthur L. Caplan

Ensuring voting rights for the aging and mentally ill
At what point is someone too impaired to cast a ballot?
by Arthur L. Caplan

An Introduction to Bioethics
Scopes of the field and a brief history of bioethics
by Arthur L. Caplan, Glenn McGee

Economic Issues
Ethical issues in health care allocation and resources
by Arthur L. Caplan, Glenn McGee

Society vs. the Individual
Conflict posed by individual and society on issues such as assisted suicide and religious reasons
by Arthur L. Caplan, Glenn McGee

More Articles...

The Full Cost of Medical Fraud
Feb 08 (Miami Herald) Medical fraud kills people. Because it does this slowly and indirectly, we tend not to notice it, and our response is more often the clucking of tongues than the moral outrage that usually accompanies mass murder.

Illinois Court Nullifies Medical Malpractice Caps
Feb 04 (NPR Blog) The top court in President Obama's home state just struck down a law that capped malpractice awards against doctors and hospitals.

Learning “Curves”: Bioethics Memory Aid Can Help Assess Patient Decision-Making Capacity in Medical Emergencies
Feb 04 (Newswise) Physicians in training and bioethicists at Johns Hopkins have created an easy-to-remember checklist to help medical students and clinicians quickly assess a patient’s decision-making capacity in an emergency.

F.D.A. Aims at Doctors’ Drug Pitches
Feb 01 (New York Times) In the rarefied world of fashion magazines, beauty editors have often relied on a coterie of prominent dermatologists and plastic surgeons to keep them current on advances in cosmetic medicine. This symbiotic relationship has benefited magazines eager for beauty scoops and doctors seeking visibility — and patients.

Doctor's Claims Linking Autism and Vaccine Are Ruled Unethical
Jan 29 (St. Petersburg Times) British physician Andrew Wakefield, who claimed links between a common children's vaccine and autism, failed in his duties and acted against the interest of the children in his care, the General Medical Council ruled Thursday.

More News...