By-Person Factor Analysis in Clinical Ethical Decision Making: Q methodology in End of Life Care Decisions
Objective: To determine the usefulness of Q methodology to locate and describe shared sub-jective influences on clinical decision making among participant physicians using hypothetical cases containing common ethical issues. Design: Qualitative study using by-person factor analysis of subjective Q sort data matrix. Setting: University medical center. Participants: Convenience sample of internal medicine attending physicians and house staff (n = 35) at one midwestern academic health sciences center. Interventions: Presented with four hypothetical cases involving urgent decision making near the end of life, participants selected one of three specific clinical actions offered for each case. Immediately afterward and while considering their decision, each respondent sorted twenty-five subjective self-referent items in terms of the influence of each statement on their decision-making process. By-person factor analysis, where participants are defined as variates, yielded information about the attitudinal background the physicians brought to their consideration of each hypothetical case. We performed a second-order factor analysis on all of the subjective viewpoints to determine if a smaller core of shared attitudes existed across some or all of the four case vignettes. Factor scores for each item and post-sort comments from interviews conducted individually with each respondent guided the interpretation of ethical perspective used by these respondents in making clinical decisions about the cases. Measurements and Main Results: Second-order factor analysis on seventeen viewpoints used by physicians in the four hypothetical urgent decision cases revealed three moderately corre-lated (r 2 < 40%) subjective core attitudinal guides used broadly among all the cases and among sixteen of the seventeen original factors. Across all the cases, our participants were guided in general by: (1) patient-focused beneficence, (2) a patient-and surrogate-focused perspective that includes risk avoidance, and (3) best interest of the patient guided by ethical values. Eco-nomic impact on the physician, expediency in resolution of the situation, and the expense of medical treatment were not found to be influential determinants in this study. Conclusions: Qsorting and by-person factor analysis are useful qualitative methodological tools to study the complex structure of subjective attitudes that influence physicians in making med-ical decisions. This study revealed the subjective viewpoints used by our physician participants as they made ethically challenging treatment decisions. The three second-order factors identi-fied here are grounded in current bioethical values as well as the personal traits of physicians. The participants' decision methods appear to resemble casuistry more than principle-based decision making. Generalizability of results will require further studies.
by William Wong, Arnold R. Eiser, Paul S. Heckerling, Robert G. Mrtek

Report Paints Grim Picture of Drug Trial Safety
Criticism of FDA's weak oversight are on target, but Congress shares blame.

by Arthur L. Caplan

Pour the Bottled-Water Trend Down the Drain
At a fashionable eatery, I asked for tap water. Eyeballs rolled, but I was right in my request. Why? Because it’s time for those of us who care about the environment and are concerned about global warming to stop buying and drinking bottled water.
by Arthur L. Caplan

Nothing Funny About "Sicko"
Gitmo prisoners get better medical treatment than Sept. 11 rescue workers.

by Arthur L. Caplan

Broken Mental-Health System Puts Us at Risk
Va. Tech and spate of other killings reveal danger of ignoring mental illness.
by Arthur L. Caplan

Our dying health-care system
And other big bioethics stories of the year
by Arthur L. Caplan

More Articles...

GOP Rep. on Mammograms: "This Is How Rationing Begins"
Nov 19 (CBS News) Recently released breast cancer screening recommendations represent a "step backward" for women's health care and the "slippery slope" health care could take under Democrats' proposed policies, a group of Republican congresswomen said today.

AP POLL: Tax the rich to pay for health bill
Nov 17 (Associated Press) When it comes to paying for a health care overhaul, Americans see just one way to go: Tax the rich. The poll, conducted by Stanford University with the nonpartisan Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, found participants sour on other ways of paying for the health overhaul that is being considered in Congress, including taxing insurers on high-value coverage packages derided by President Barack Obama and Democrats as "Cadillac plans."

Obese? Your Doctor May Have Less Respect For You
Oct 28 (Baltimore Sun) Anyone who has struggled with their weight knows what it's like to be on the receiving end of fat jokes. Despite a national obesity epidemic, our society isn't particularly sensitive to overweight people. Doctors included.

Extra pounds, and attitudes about them, can affect doctor-patient relationships
Oct 22 (Los Angeles Times) Doctors can be fairly significant, one would think, in helping people combat obesity-related health problems. But a good working relationship usually begins with respect. And that might be a stumbling block.

Health Care Reform's Elephant in the Room
Oct 14 (AScribe) There may not be a simple solution to the complex problem of reforming health care, but bioethicist Mark Aita, S.J., M.D., assistant director of the Institute for Catholic Bioethics at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia, is certain of one thing - the elephant in the room that no one wants to discuss is that insured Americans contribute to the problem.

More News...