<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bioethics.net &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioethics.net/topics/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioethics.net</link>
	<description>Where the World Finds Bioethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:39:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vermont Passes Physician-Assisted-Suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/vermont-passes-physician-assisted-suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/vermont-passes-physician-assisted-suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Klugman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[End of Life Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician assisted suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=47409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Craig Klugman, Ph.D.</p>
<p>Awaiting the governor’s signature, Vermont is poised to become the fourth state to legalize physician-assisted suicide. While Oregon and Washington legalized physician-aid-in-dying through public referendum and Montana through a court decision, Vermont’s is occurring through the legislative process.</p>
<p>The first U.S. aid-in-dying law was the Oregon 1994 Death with Dignity Act. The law faced a referendum to appeal it in 1997 and a Bush administration court challenge was ruled on in 2006.</p>
<p>The Vermont law mirrors those of Oregon and Washington.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/vermont-passes-physician-assisted-suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon, Bioethics and Planetary Health</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/carbon-bioethics-and-planetary-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/carbon-bioethics-and-planetary-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Klugman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=47363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Craig Klugman, Ph.D.</p>
<p>On May 9, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography independently reported measurements of mean concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels of nearly 400 parts per million (it was actually 399.89 ppm).  For the last 800,000 years, the Earth has not broken 300ppm. This is significant because it shows that despite weak international efforts, atmospheric carbon levels are increasing on an exponential curve.</p>
<p>The number 400ppm is arbitrary but was chosen as a milestone to draw attention to the continuing scientific concern over the increase of atmospheric carbon.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/carbon-bioethics-and-planetary-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magical NC Bill Builds Obstacles to Teen Health</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/magical-nc-bill-builds-obstacles-to-teen-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/magical-nc-bill-builds-obstacles-to-teen-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Klugman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cultural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Disparities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Regulation & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?p=47312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Craig Klugman, Ph.D.</p>
<p>If you’re a teen in North Carolina, a new bill before the legislature may make it more difficult for you to get sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, mental health counseling, pregnancy care or even substance abuse treatment. To receive any of those, a teen would need written, notarized parental consent. A parent could not simply give permission on the phone, via a note, or even by signing a consent form. No, the parent has to use a notary to give permission.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/05/magical-nc-bill-builds-obstacles-to-teen-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cass Sunstein Takes on the Death Panel Myth</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/04/cass-sunstein-takes-on-the-death-panel-myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/04/cass-sunstein-takes-on-the-death-panel-myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ubel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Ubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterubel.com/?p=3760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote a while back about some research I conducted with Jason Reifler and Brendan Nyhan on how fact checking influences people&#8217;s belief in whether Obamacare created death panels, to decide which old or disabled peoples to kill.  Yesterday, Cas...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/04/cass-sunstein-takes-on-the-death-panel-myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abraham Lincoln on Perspective Taking</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/03/abraham-lincoln-on-perspective-taking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/03/abraham-lincoln-on-perspective-taking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ubel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Ubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterubel.com/?p=3664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I write frequently about the importance of perspective taking in clinician/patient interaction. Seeing the world through other people’s eyes is also a crucial moral and political skill. No surprise then that Abe Lincoln showed great perspective takin...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/03/abraham-lincoln-on-perspective-taking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House defends drone-war killing of Americans</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-defends-drone-war-killing-of-americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-defends-drone-war-killing-of-americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=42776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-defends-drone-war-killing-of-americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partisan Drift Over the Environment: Are Republicans Wandering Away from their Voters?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/01/partisan-drift-over-the-environment-are-republicans-wandering-away-from-their-voters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/01/partisan-drift-over-the-environment-are-republicans-wandering-away-from-their-voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ubel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Ubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterubel.com/?p=3283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There’s a fascinating new analysis available, looking at parallels between the politics of health care and the environment. It is led by Theda Skocpol, a social scientist at Harvard (whose writing about health policy and the Tea Party are wonderful)...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2013/01/partisan-drift-over-the-environment-are-republicans-wandering-away-from-their-voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House answers Death Star petition: No</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-answers-death-star-petition-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-answers-death-star-petition-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=39544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-answers-death-star-petition-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom from Earsplitting Ads: The CALM Act Goes Into Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/freedom-from-earsplitting-ads-the-calm-act-goes-into-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/freedom-from-earsplitting-ads-the-calm-act-goes-into-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=38037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/freedom-from-earsplitting-ads-the-calm-act-goes-into-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political opinions: fast herd or slow ideology?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/12/political-opinions-fast-herd-or-slow-ideology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/12/political-opinions-fast-herd-or-slow-ideology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ramsoy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brainethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our latest work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainethics.org/?p=1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes politicians make claims that may seem at odds with the ideological background they represent. Would you agree with your party if they presented a statement that went against their ideological foundation? Put this way, you would probably not, ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2012/12/political-opinions-fast-herd-or-slow-ideology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States Spend Anti-Smoking $$ on Other Things</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/states-spend-anti-smoking-on-other-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/states-spend-anti-smoking-on-other-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Regulation & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=37994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/states-spend-anti-smoking-on-other-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethics in Play, Voters Oust Incumbents Under Scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/ethics-in-play-voters-oust-incumbents-under-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/ethics-in-play-voters-oust-incumbents-under-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=37667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/ethics-in-play-voters-oust-incumbents-under-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Synthetic Biology Scorecard Finds Federal Agencies Responding to Presidential Bioethics Commission Report</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/synthetic-biology-scorecard-finds-federal-agencies-responding-to-presidential-bioethics-commission-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/synthetic-biology-scorecard-finds-federal-agencies-responding-to-presidential-bioethics-commission-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empirical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic biology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=37091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/synthetic-biology-scorecard-finds-federal-agencies-responding-to-presidential-bioethics-commission-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unusual Alliances Form In Nebraska&#8217;s Prenatal Care Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/unusual-alliances-form-in-nebraskas-prenatal-care-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/unusual-alliances-form-in-nebraskas-prenatal-care-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=36364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/unusual-alliances-form-in-nebraskas-prenatal-care-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stay Awake, Comrades</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/stay-awake-comrades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/stay-awake-comrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=36337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/stay-awake-comrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confusion Reigns in Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/confusion-reigns-in-tennessee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/confusion-reigns-in-tennessee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=36273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/confusion-reigns-in-tennessee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House and the F.D.A. Often at Odds</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-and-the-f-d-a-often-at-odds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-and-the-f-d-a-often-at-odds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=36120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/white-house-and-the-f-d-a-often-at-odds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bioethicist calls on Congress to protect physicians in war zones</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethicist-calls-on-congress-to-protect-physicians-in-war-zones-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethicist-calls-on-congress-to-protect-physicians-in-war-zones-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=35784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethicist-calls-on-congress-to-protect-physicians-in-war-zones-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bioethicist Calls Jon Stewart &#8216;Our Greatest Public Intellectual&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethicist-calls-jon-stewart-our-greatest-public-intellectual/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethicist-calls-jon-stewart-our-greatest-public-intellectual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kayhan Parsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=35733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethicist-calls-jon-stewart-our-greatest-public-intellectual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Religious Exemption for Contraception Coverage is Bad Medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/a-religious-exemption-for-contraception-coverage-is-bad-medicine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/a-religious-exemption-for-contraception-coverage-is-bad-medicine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The American Journal of Bioethics</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethics.net/?post_type=news&#038;p=35458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/a-religious-exemption-for-contraception-coverage-is-bad-medicine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personalities, Politics, and Bioethics</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/personalities-politics-and-bioethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/personalities-politics-and-bioethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics. personality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/personalities-politics-and-bioethics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/personalities-politics-and-bioethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dead Man Walking?Politics, Sr. Helen Prejean, and the Vocation of the Bioethicist</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/dead-man-walkingpolitics-sr-helen-prejean-and-the-vocation-of-the-bioethicist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/dead-man-walkingpolitics-sr-helen-prejean-and-the-vocation-of-the-bioethicist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/dead-man-walkingpolitics-sr-helen-prejean-and-the-vocation-of-the-bioethicist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/dead-man-walkingpolitics-sr-helen-prejean-and-the-vocation-of-the-bioethicist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Political Satirist as Public Intellectual: The Case of Jon Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/the-political-satirist-as-public-intellectual-the-case-of-jon-stewart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/the-political-satirist-as-public-intellectual-the-case-of-jon-stewart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/the-political-satirist-as-public-intellectual-the-case-of-jon-stewart/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/the-political-satirist-as-public-intellectual-the-case-of-jon-stewart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William B. Hurlbut: Building a Bridge Over Troubled Stem Cell Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/william-b-hurlbut-building-a-bridge-over-troubled-stem-cell-waters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/william-b-hurlbut-building-a-bridge-over-troubled-stem-cell-waters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/william-b-hurlbut-building-a-bridge-over-troubled-stem-cell-waters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/william-b-hurlbut-building-a-bridge-over-troubled-stem-cell-waters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toward a ?Magenta? Public Bioethics Discourse?Bart Stupak and Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/toward-a-magenta-public-bioethics-discoursebart-stupak-and-health-care-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/toward-a-magenta-public-bioethics-discoursebart-stupak-and-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/toward-a-magenta-public-bioethics-discoursebart-stupak-and-health-care-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/toward-a-magenta-public-bioethics-discoursebart-stupak-and-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reason Giving: When Public Leaders Ignore Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/reason-giving-when-public-leaders-ignore-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/reason-giving-when-public-leaders-ignore-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/reason-giving-when-public-leaders-ignore-evidence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/reason-giving-when-public-leaders-ignore-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>215</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sense and Nonsense in the Conservative Critique of Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/sense-and-nonsense-in-the-conservative-critique-of-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/sense-and-nonsense-in-the-conservative-critique-of-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/sense-and-nonsense-in-the-conservative-critique-of-obamacare/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/sense-and-nonsense-in-the-conservative-critique-of-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Ezekiel J. Emanuel. Healthcare Guaranteed: a Simple, Secure Solution for America.</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/review-of-ezekiel-j-emanuel-healthcare-guaranteed-a-simple-secure-solution-for-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/review-of-ezekiel-j-emanuel-healthcare-guaranteed-a-simple-secure-solution-for-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/review-of-ezekiel-j-emanuel-healthcare-guaranteed-a-simple-secure-solution-for-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/review-of-ezekiel-j-emanuel-healthcare-guaranteed-a-simple-secure-solution-for-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And Health for All?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/and-health-for-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/and-health-for-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/and-health-for-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/and-health-for-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of K. R. Monroe, R. B. Miller, and J. Tobis. Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate: The Scientific, Religious, Ethical and Political Issues. * Review of C. B. Cohen. Renewing the Stuff of Life: Stem Cells, Ethics, and Public Policy. * Review of R. K</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/review-of-k-r-monroe-r-b-miller-and-j-tobis-fundamentals-of-the-stem-cell-debate-the-scientific-religious-ethical-and-political-issues-review-of-c-b-cohen-renewing-the-stuff-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/review-of-k-r-monroe-r-b-miller-and-j-tobis-fundamentals-of-the-stem-cell-debate-the-scientific-religious-ethical-and-political-issues-review-of-c-b-cohen-renewing-the-stuff-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/review-of-k-r-monroe-r-b-miller-and-j-tobis-fundamentals-of-the-stem-cell-debate-the-scientific-religious-ethical-and-political-issues-review-of-c-b-cohen-renewing-the-stuff-of-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/review-of-k-r-monroe-r-b-miller-and-j-tobis-fundamentals-of-the-stem-cell-debate-the-scientific-religious-ethical-and-political-issues-review-of-c-b-cohen-renewing-the-stuff-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Public Health and Politics Don&#8217;t Mix</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/why-public-health-and-politics-dont-mix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/why-public-health-and-politics-dont-mix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/why-public-health-and-politics-dont-mix/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/why-public-health-and-politics-dont-mix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biotechnology and the New Right: Neoconservatism&#8217;s Red Menace</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/biotechnology-and-the-new-right-neoconservatisms-red-menace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/biotechnology-and-the-new-right-neoconservatisms-red-menace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neoconservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/biotechnology-and-the-new-right-neoconservatisms-red-menace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/biotechnology-and-the-new-right-neoconservatisms-red-menace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Show Me&#8221; Bioethics and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/show-me-bioethics-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/show-me-bioethics-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end of life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/show-me-bioethics-and-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/show-me-bioethics-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Health, Public Trust and Lobbying</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/public-health-public-trust-and-lobbying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/public-health-public-trust-and-lobbying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/public-health-public-trust-and-lobbying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/public-health-public-trust-and-lobbying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>166</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why a Criminal Ban? Analyzing the Arguments Against Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Canadian Parliamentary Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/why-a-criminal-ban-analyzing-the-arguments-against-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-in-the-canadian-parliamentary-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/why-a-criminal-ban-analyzing-the-arguments-against-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-in-the-canadian-parliamentary-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/why-a-criminal-ban-analyzing-the-arguments-against-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-in-the-canadian-parliamentary-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/why-a-criminal-ban-analyzing-the-arguments-against-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-in-the-canadian-parliamentary-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics and Peer Review</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/politics-and-peer-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/politics-and-peer-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/politics-and-peer-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/politics-and-peer-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bioethics for the President and Bioethics for the People</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/bioethics-for-the-president-and-bioethics-for-the-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/bioethics-for-the-president-and-bioethics-for-the-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/articles/bioethics-for-the-president-and-bioethics-for-the-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/articles/bioethics-for-the-president-and-bioethics-for-the-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama tweaks birth control rule</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/obama-tweaks-birth-control-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/obama-tweaks-birth-control-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/obama-tweaks-birth-control-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/obama-tweaks-birth-control-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bioethics panel urges system to compensate those hurt in medical experiments</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethics-panel-urges-system-to-compensate-those-hurt-in-medical-experiments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethics-panel-urges-system-to-compensate-those-hurt-in-medical-experiments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/bioethics-panel-urges-system-to-compensate-those-hurt-in-medical-experiments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/bioethics-panel-urges-system-to-compensate-those-hurt-in-medical-experiments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stem cells: Research funding and the 2012 elections</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/stem-cells-research-funding-and-the-2012-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/stem-cells-research-funding-and-the-2012-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/stem-cells-research-funding-and-the-2012-elections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/stem-cells-research-funding-and-the-2012-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food Fight: Industry versus the IOM</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If we are what we eat, shouldn&#8217;t we know what we are, in fact, eating? This simple idea may be much harder to support than one would guess thanks to lobbying on the part of the food industry, says <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/20/8418226-know-what-youre-eating-not-if-food-industry-has-its-way">Arthur Caplan in his MSNBC column today</a>. </p>
<p>As <a href="http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/20/8418226-know-what-youre-eating-not-if-food-industry-has-its-way">Caplan explains</a>, an IOM report released today recommended the simplification of food labels so that consumers can with a passing glance know the nutritional value (or lack thereof) in the food we eat.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/10/food-fight-industry-versus-the-iom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri Senate Ignores Pro-Life Concerns on Bioethics Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/missouri-senate-ignores-pro-life-concerns-on-bioethics-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/missouri-senate-ignores-pro-life-concerns-on-bioethics-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/missouri-senate-ignores-pro-life-concerns-on-bioethics-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/missouri-senate-ignores-pro-life-concerns-on-bioethics-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University of Wisconsin refuses to release records on disciplining doctors</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/university-of-wisconsin-refuses-to-release-records-on-disciplining-doctors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/university-of-wisconsin-refuses-to-release-records-on-disciplining-doctors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/university-of-wisconsin-refuses-to-release-records-on-disciplining-doctors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/university-of-wisconsin-refuses-to-release-records-on-disciplining-doctors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Will Debt-Ceiling Deal Affect Medicare for Patients, Doctors?</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/how-will-debt-ceiling-deal-affect-medicare-for-patients-doctors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/how-will-debt-ceiling-deal-affect-medicare-for-patients-doctors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/how-will-debt-ceiling-deal-affect-medicare-for-patients-doctors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/how-will-debt-ceiling-deal-affect-medicare-for-patients-doctors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense Department responds to Guantanamo medicine charges</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/defense-department-responds-to-guantanamo-medicine-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/defense-department-responds-to-guantanamo-medicine-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/defense-department-responds-to-guantanamo-medicine-charges/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/defense-department-responds-to-guantanamo-medicine-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justices Question Drug-Sales Law</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/justices-question-drug-sales-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/justices-question-drug-sales-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/justices-question-drug-sales-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/justices-question-drug-sales-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women&#8217;s Health Shouldn&#8217;t Be Partisan&#8211;But It Is!</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/04/womens-health-shouldnt-be-partisanbut-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/04/womens-health-shouldnt-be-partisanbut-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/2011/04/womens-health-shouldnt-be-partisanbut-it-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/donna-e-shalala/post_1912_b_846070.html">Donna Shalala writes on the Huffington Post</a> today: &#8220;health of our women should not be a partisan preference&#8221;, but as we all know the politics of women&#8217;s health continues to plague access to reproductive health services, equitable access to health services generally, and more broadly remind us that there is still a critical gap between males and females in regard to health in our country. </p>
<p>So why is it a partisan issue? Because women&#8217;s health is so frequently reduced to reproductive health (read: abortion) and because what is easier to ignore than HIV testing and contraceptives for the conservatives who believe that neither would be necessary if we abstained from those behaviors that require them.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/2011/04/womens-health-shouldnt-be-partisanbut-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicare chief: Keep gov&#8217;t out of end-of-life care planning</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/medicare-chief-keep-govt-out-of-end-of-life-care-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/medicare-chief-keep-govt-out-of-end-of-life-care-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/medicare-chief-keep-govt-out-of-end-of-life-care-planning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/medicare-chief-keep-govt-out-of-end-of-life-care-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faking Organisms</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/faking-organisms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/faking-organisms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/faking-organisms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/faking-organisms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Drug firms fund health advocacy groups</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethics.net/news/study-drug-firms-fund-health-advocacy-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bioethics.net/news/study-drug-firms-fund-health-advocacy-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sysadmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioethics.net/news/study-drug-firms-fund-health-advocacy-groups/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bioethics.net/news/study-drug-firms-fund-health-advocacy-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.bioethics.net @ 2013-05-19 05:54:55 by W3 Total Cache -->