Get Published | Subscribe | About | Write for Our Blog    

Posted on June 11, 2019 at 3:51 PM

Carlyn Zwarenstein, a resident of Canada who lives with an autoimmune disease, characterizes the United States’ approach to opioid regulation as “draconian,” and fears that her country might follow suit. “One shift in policy,” she says, “and I would be quickly dealing not just with withdrawal symptoms, but with the more existential pain of trying to live without the daily, short-term pain relief that opioids have provided me for six years.”

As the opioid crisis reaches a fever pitch, public perception often lumps chronic pain patients and opioid abusers under the stigma-tainted umbrella of drug user. But the full picture of human interaction with pain, pain management, and addiction is far from black and white. In its most recent narrative symposium, Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics published personal stories from those living with chronic pain or opioid abuse disorder. Both groups comment on their need for medical treatment and ethical care.

“Within an hour of taking a dose of [the opioid] tramadol, I am able to sit down without pain, without fidgeting,” writes Zwarenstein. “No longer needing to focus on my breath or on mindfully observing the texture of pain in order to get through it, I can attend to the world around me, follow a conversation, wash the dishes, bend down to pick things up, walk my children to school or sit with them to watch a movie. I can work. I can finish this essay and still make dinner.”  Recognizing how addictive the drugs can be, the mother of two uses a synthetic opioid as “sparingly” as possible. Read her essay here.

As a clinical ethicist and chronic pain patient, Stowe Locke Teti echoes the necessity of opioids for pain management, as well as the vigilant regulation required to manage the drugs’ dangers. Faced with long-term debilitating spinal pain and confined to his bed, Locke Teti learned that surgery was his only option.  To prepare for the procedure, physicians weaned him off his medication, a process that left him in agonizing pain. “I remember the point at which I no longer thought of my body as mine, but rather as a shell, damaged and full of torment,” he writes. Locke Teti’s story illustrates how, without opioid support, illness can degrade the cohesive sense of self that is necessary for meaningful connection with family, friends, and society.    

For other individuals featured in the symposium, opioid use became a greater source of suffering than the pain for which the drugs were prescribed. One anonymous writer was prescribed medication after suffering a fracture, but he was not provided with a plan for tapering off the drug. He realized he was addicted once the prescription ended, and his behavior spiraled into illicit drug use, wreaking havoc to his professional life.  He ends his narrative with a plea to physicians: “You are not doing a healthy young person any favors at all by keeping them on opioids. Get them off as soon as possible.”

In his compelling narrative, physician Peter Grinspoon describes his habit of falsifying prescriptions to fuel his opioid addiction, resulting in felony charges and the loss of both family and career. “I ended up living with my elderly parents, unable to see my small children,” he writes. Grinspoon found solace in his recovery program, where addiction treatment was implemented with “compassion and empathy.” This approach, he states, “opened my eyes . . . and helped prevent me from being overcome by my guilt, by my shame, and by the remorse I had for destroying my life.” 

Chronic pain patients and opioid abusers—the latter, though stigmatized, saddled with the very real challenges of addiction—face the convoluted landscape of opioid legislation with trepidation. In his commentary on the symposium, also featured in the issue, bioethicist Travis Rieder warns against overly simplistic approaches to the problem. “We must stop swinging the pendulum between radical permissiveness and opioid abandonment and fear,” he writes. He emphasizes that appropriate treatment for chronic pain patients and those with opioid abuse disorder demands creative and systematic change. The narratives featured in NIB reveal no easy answers but offer an informed and human foundation for compassionate action.

Cara Crew is a graduate student at the Bioethics Institute at Loyola Marymount University. Mary Click is the communications coordinator for Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics.

 

45% of The Hastings Center’s work is supported by individual donors like you.
Support our work.

The post Living with Pain and Opioid Addiction: Bioethics Narratives appeared first on The Hastings Center.

Comments are closed.