Posted on January 6, 2020 at 12:21 PM
In recent days, the Texas Advance Directive Act (TADA), signed into law in 1999 by then-Governor George W. Bush, has come under scrutiny because of the tragic case of Tinslee Lewis.
From press accounts we learn that Tinslee is now 11 months old and suffers from several conditions which have led doctors at Cook Children’s Medical Center to conclude that any further treatment would only be harmful to her, adding to her already painful existence. One of her doctors has said, “She is in pain. Changing a diaper causes pain. Suctioning her breathing tube causes pain. Being on the ventilator causes pain.” TADA allows the hospital to stop such treatment after ten days if the patient’s doctors and the hospital’s ethics committee conclude there is nothing more that can be done and no other facility is able to take the patient.
Because Tinslee’s mother objects to the hospital’s conclusion, the case is now working its way through the court system. Last week a District Judge decided in favor of the hospital, but the next day the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth ordered a stay.
Observing the legal back and forth, the Washington Post points out, “In Tinslee’s case, however, anti-abortion groups are divided. While Texas Right to Life took Lewis’s side, the Texas Alliance for Life and the Texans for Life Coalition have said they agree with the doctors.” In a statement issued last week on the judge’s ruling supporting the use of TADA, the Texas Alliance for Life commented: “We don’t see how she could have ruled any other way. As we have stated previously, Texas Alliance for Life supports TADA. It is good public policy, it is constitutional, and it provides a balance between the patient’s autonomy and the physicians conscience protection rights to do no harm.”
At the time of writing this post, there doesn’t seem to be a solution that will please all involved. Thus, we don’t hastily run to judgment here. We acknowledge the hospital’s consideration of the futility issue (especially as it seeks to ‘do no harm’) as well as the pain of a family that wants to extend the life of their beloved child. I would simply add that in all such cases, the human side of the equation needs to be considered.