Get Published | Subscribe | About | Write for Our Blog    

Author Archive: Jon Holmlund

About Jon Holmlund

Some common mislocutions are simply insufferable.  One is, “It’s in my/our DNA,” implying that a commitment or habit or practiced behavior is genetically hard-wired.  No, it isn’t. Another is, “I/we will follow the science” to make judgments.  If by this is meant, “I will face facts rather than engage in wishful thinking,” then hear, hear.  …

Continue reading "“The Science” and Moral Judgments"

Full Article

Let us stipulate at the outset: first, that so much—far too much? –is being written on the COVID-19 outbreak, and wisdom is a precious commodity; second, that although your correspondent is an MD, he is as bewildered as anyone by the storm of reports, claims, data, projections, arguments; and third, that whatever public comity may …

Continue reading "More—with trepidation—on COVID"

Full Article

As one with the letters “M” and “D” after my name, I get emails from a service called Medscape (subscription generally required), with links to a variety of articles on things medical.  This week brings a link to a piece under the title “Inexact Science: is Patient Eligible for Medical Aid in Dying?”   The upshot: …

Continue reading "More notes on suicide—assisted or not"

Full Article

In May of 2019 The New Bioethics carried a paper (purchase or subscription required) by Jennifer Gumer of Columbia and Loyola Marymount Universities, summarizing an argument against heritable genome editing (the kind in which an embryo’s genes are edited so that the change will be passed down to the subject’s descendants), based on Belmont principalism.  …

Continue reading "A principalist argument against heritable genome editing"

Full Article

Some weeks ago, a utilitarian perspective in favor of heritable genome editing was published (purchase or subscription required to read).  In it, the author, Kevin Smith of Abertay University in the United Kingdom, begins with a general defense of utilitarianism, the ethical philosophy that what is morally good is what produces the greatest good for …

Continue reading "An argument for heritable genome editing"

Full Article

The title does not mean societal or legal control of gene editing technology.  Rather, it speaks of controlling, or shutting off, a specific gene editing process.  In retrospect, it had to be the case that there is a resistance, or control, mechanism for the CRISPR system, the gene-editing machinery that functions as a way for …

Continue reading "Controlling gene editing"

Full Article

A writer in Nature says that China sent a “strong signal” by punishing He Jiankui and two colleagues with fines, jail times, and bans against working again in human reproductive technology or applying for research funding.  (They lost their jobs as well and may not be able to do research work, presumably in any field, …

Continue reading "Chastening and enthusiasm about genome editing"

Full Article

As Joy Riley pointed out on this blog on December 7, the world and the scientific community recently marked, with almost no fanfare, the one-year birthday of “Lulu” and “Nana,” the first (we think) and still only (we think) humans to have had their genes edited heritably—in a way that will be passed on to …

Continue reading "Can we hop the gene-editing train?"

Full Article

Yesterday’s post to this blog addressed physicians’ conscience rights.  The standard shape of arguments about preserving individual physicians’ conscience rights goes, broadly, like this:  certain actions now sanctioned by society (e.g., abortion, assisted suicide) have been embraced by the medical profession as standard medical care which all physicians should be willing to perform, but this …

Continue reading "More on Physicians’ Conscience Rights"

Full Article

One caution when objecting to the prospect of heritable human gene editing is to take care not to overestimate what it technically possible.  That is, an all-too-easy argument is that attempts to edit a disease gene will lead, by momentum if nothing else, to “designer babies,” with children not just being genetically selected but in …

Continue reading "Skepticism about polygene scores to select for IQ and height"

Full Article