Hot Topics: Research Ethics

Blog Posts (87)

October 12, 2017

Justice and Bioethics: Who Should Finance Academic Publishing?

by Udo Schuklenk (Joint Editor in Chief) & David Magnus (Editor in Chief)
We applaud Chattopadhyay, Muyser, Moxham & DeVries on their article, “A Question of Social Justice: How Policies of Profit Negate Engagement of Developing World Bioethicsts and Undermine Bioethicists” for tackling an important and often neglected topic in bioethics: the challenges that our under-resourced colleagues face in conducting research and contributing to the literature in bioethics.…

September 27, 2017

What Does Silence Say?

STUDENT VOICES | CHYNN PRIZE SECOND-PLACE WINNER By Amy Endres There had never once been a public opinion poll done in El Salvador until Ignacio Martín-Baró, a Jesuit, set out as the only doctoral-level psychologist in the country to measure the opinion of the people in the 1980s.[1]  He knew this would be difficult.  He … More What Does Silence Say?
September 22, 2017

Ethics & Society Newsfeed: September 22, 2017

Politics Donald Trump’s Lies and Obstruction Will End His Presidency, Ex-Ethics Chief Says “A former White House ethics chief says that Donald Trump would likely be impeached if it is proven he sought to obstruct justice by firing ex-FBI Director James Comey in hopes of ending his investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.” Public … More Ethics & Society Newsfeed: September 22, 2017
September 6, 2017

Response to the Common Rule Special Issue: Attention to Health Disparities

by Nicolle K. Strand, JD, MBioethics, and Nora Jones, PhD

The article and commentaries on recent revisions to the Common Rule published in the July 2017 issue of AJOB are missing, we believe, a key perspective.…

August 18, 2017

Ethics & Society Newsfeed: August 18, 2017

Politics Neil Gorsuch Speech at Trump Hotel Raises Ethical Questions “Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, President Trump’s Supreme Court appointee, is scheduled to address a conservative group at the Trump International Hotel in Washington next month, less than two weeks before the court is set to hear arguments on Mr. Trump’s travel ban.” Trump’s Washington DC hotel … More Ethics & Society Newsfeed: August 18, 2017
August 4, 2017

The Age of Designed Babies Arrives

by Craig Klugman, Ph.D.

In the film Gattaca, a couple desiring to have a child visits their neighborhood geneticist:

Geneticist: You have specified hazel eyes, dark hair and fair skin.

July 26, 2017

Authorship and Pets

The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors is an influential group that, as expected, takes publication and authorship very seriously.  They have issued the most generally accepted definition of the criteria for authorship of scientific publications. They list these criteria very clearly and unambiguously on their website. These criteria are:

“The ICMJE recommends that authorship be based on the following 4 criteria:

  -Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND

  -Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AN

  -Final approval of the version to be published; AND

  -Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. “

They go on to say “All those designated as authors should meet all four criteria for authorship, and all who meet the four criteria should be identified as authors.” There does not seem to leave much doubt as to their meaning. The practise of guest authorship, including authors with non-substantive contributions by virtue of their position was once common but is now considered inappropriate. However, no simple set of guidelines can address all possible circumstances. Which raises the point I am addressing in this blog: What about pets?

An important paper on atomic behaviour published in Physical Reviews by Jack Hetherington and F.D.C. Willard is the object of this question.

F.D.C. Willard was Jack Hetherington’s Siamese cat Chester. The name represents Felix domesticus Chester Willard.  Willard was Chester’s father also obviously a cat. Chester eventually published a sole author paper, an impressive accomplishment indeed for a cat. Hethrington’s motivation for this offense was the realization that he had used plural terms such as “we” and “our” throughout the manuscript. It was easier to add an author than to edit the entire manuscript.

The pertinent question then is whether F.D.C. Willard met the criteria for authorship. Without going into a lengthy analysis of the likelihood that the criteria were met I am merely going to suggest that I believe it was highly unlikely. In the terminology of research ethics today this would be considered fabrication and falsification, both criteria for research misconduct. So did Jack Hetherington commit research misconduct? The answer, literally, is yes. However, I am going to suggest that he should probably be pardoned for his offense. The reason for this is clear. He was merely making a joke. Science for all its clear value is often a bit humourless. Pranks like this are remembered forty years later in a way that very few actual scientific papers are remembered. After all, F.D.C. Willard has a Wikipedia entry and Jack Hetherington does not. I still do have one concern to address. It is very hard to believe that a cat could actually be a co-author. This would be much more credible if Professor Hetherington had cited his dog.

The Alden March Bioethics Institute offers a Master of Science in Bioethics, a Doctorate of Professional Studies in Bioethics, and Graduate Certificates in Clinical Ethics and Clinical Ethics Consultation. For more information on AMBI's online graduate programs, please visit our website.  

July 19, 2017

Response to: “Rethinking the Belmont Report? Yes!”

by Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman, and Arthur L. Caplan

Emily Caldes and Jennifer McCormick make several excellent points in their blog post “Rethinking the Belmont Report?…

July 7, 2017

The 2017 Common Rule and the Clinical Ethics of Prolixity

Some bioethicists link the beginnings of our field to the Nazi Medical experiments and the Nuremberg Trial (Annas). Whether this is the beginning of bioethics is debatable, but without a doubt, research ethics has been a central topic in the field.

July 6, 2017

Rethinking the Belmont Report?

Some bioethicists link the beginnings of our field to the Nazi Medical experiments and the Nuremberg Trial (Annas). Whether this is the beginning of bioethics is debatable, but without a doubt, research ethics has been a central topic in the field.

View More Blog Entries

Published Articles (204)

AJOB Primary Research: Volume 8 Issue 3 - Sep 2017

Main outcomes of an RCT to pilot test reporting and feedback to foster research integrity climates in the VA Brian C. Martinson , David C. Mohr, Martin P. Charns, David Nelson, Emily Hagel-Campbell, Ann Bangerter, Hanna E. Bloomfield, Richard Owen & Carol R. Thrush

AJOB Primary Research: Volume 8 Issue 3 - Sep 2017

Physician understanding and application of surrogate decision-making laws in clinical practice Amber Rose Comer, Margaret Gaffney, Cynthia L. Stone & Alexia Torke

AJOB Primary Research: Volume 8 Issue 3 - Sep 2017

Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views Emily E. Anderson, Susan B. Newman & Alicia K. Matthews

American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 17 Issue 7 - Jul 2017

The Final Rule: When the Rubber Meets the Road P. Pearl O'Rourke

American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 17 Issue 7 - Jul 2017

Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule Jeremy Sugarman

American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 17 Issue 7 - Jul 2017

Rethinking the Belmont Report? Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman & Arthur L. Caplan

American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 17 Issue 7 - Jul 2017

A Proposed Process for Reliably Updating the Common Rule Benjamin E. Berkman, David Wendler, Haley K. Sullivan & Christine Grady

American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 17 Issue 7 - Jul 2017

At Last! Aye, and There's the Rub Alexander M. Capron

American Journal of Bioethics: Volume 17 Issue 7 - Jul 2017

Modernizing Research Regulations Is Not Enough: It's Time to Think Outside the Regulatory Box Suzanne M. Rivera, Kyle B. Brothers, R. Jean Cadigan, Heather L. Harrell, Mark A. Rothstein, Richard R. Sharp & Aaron J. Goldenberg

AJOB Primary Research: Volume 8 Issue 2 - Apr 2017

Primary care physicians' views about gatekeeping in clinical research recruitment: A qualitative study Marilys Guillemin, Rosalind McDougall, Dominique Martin, Nina Hallowell, Alison Brookes & Lynn Gillam

View More Articles

News (410)

October 13, 2017 9:00 am

Navajo Nation reconsiders ban on genetic research (Nature)

When the Navajo Nation opens its first oncology centre next year in Tuba City, Arizona, clinicians there may be able to offer a service that has been banned on tribal lands for 15 years: analyzing the DNA of Navajo tribe members to guide treatments and study the genetic roots of disease.

October 2, 2017 9:00 am

Chinese scientists fix genetic disorder in cloned human embryos (Nature)

A team in China has taken a new approach to fixing disease genes in human embryos. The researchers created cloned embryos with a genetic mutation for a potentially fatal blood disorder, and then precisely corrected the DNA to show how the condition might be prevented at the earliest stages of development.

September 28, 2017 9:00 am

Whistleblowers at U.S. funded research institutions fear retaliation (Washington Post)

Consider the impact of the Public Health Service’s scandalous “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.” Patients were denied needed treatment in the name of science. Launched in 1932, it lasted 40 years and is an example of perverted research with lingering negative consequences. Now comes an investigative report about deterrents in reporting problems with human research. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General found evidence of a fear of retaliation among whistleblowers in research institutions.

August 30, 2017 9:00 am

Basic studies of how our brains work are now clinical trials, NIH says (Science)

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, has confirmed that the agency’s definition of clinical trials now includes imaging studies of normal brain function that do not test new treatments. The change will impose new requirements that many researchers say don’t make sense and could stifle cognitive neuroscience.

August 17, 2017 9:00 am

Artificial intelligence identifies plant species for science (Nature)

Computer algorithms trained on the images of thousands of preserved plants have learned to automatically identify species that have been pressed, dried and mounted on herbarium sheets, researchers report.

August 14, 2017 9:00 am

Americans are becoming more open to human genome editing, survey finds, but concerns remain (Science)

CRISPR, the powerful genome-editing tool, does a molecular tango to cut and modify DNA that is highly nuanced. The same subtlety applies to the public’s views on how best to use genome editing in humans, a new survey of adults in the United States shows.

July 28, 2017 9:00 am

First U.S. team to gene-edit human embryos revealed (Science)

Since Chinese researchers announced the first gene editing of a human embryo 2 years ago, many expected that similar work in the United States was inevitable. Last night, the MIT Technology Review broke the news that such experiments have happened. The research, led by embryologist Shoukhrat Mitalipov of Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, also reportedly sidestepped problems of incomplete and off-target editing that plagued previous attempts, though details could not be confirmed since the work is not yet published and Mitalipov has so far declined to comment.

July 4, 2017 9:00 am

Single-cell sequencing made simple (Nature)

Single-cell biology is a hot topic these days. And at the cutting edge of the field is single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Conventional ‘bulk’ methods of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) process hundreds of thousands of cells at a time and average out the differences. But no two cells are exactly alike, and scRNA-seq can reveal the subtle changes that make each one unique. It can even reveal entirely new cell types.

June 30, 2017 9:00 am

Stem cell approach for cataracts challenged (Science)

A team of ophthalmologists and stem cell scientists is advancing a controversial new approach to treating cataracts, the clumping of lens proteins that blurs the vision of about one in six Americans over age 40, plus thousands of infants born every year. Instead of replacing the cloudy lens with a plastic replacement, this technique relies on the capsule’s resident stem cell to regrow an entire new lens.

June 16, 2017 9:00 am

Biologists debate how to license preprints (Nature)

Biology’s zeal for preprints — papers posted online before peer review — is opening up a thorny legal debate: should scientists license their manuscripts on open-access terms? Researchers have now shared more than 11,000 papers at the popular bioRxiv preprints site. But where some researchers allow their bioRxiv manuscripts to be freely redistributed and reused, others have chosen to lock them down with restrictive terms.

View More News Items