In Sunday’s NYT, Benedict Carey looks at the discussion that has followed that Nature commentary about professors who use cognitive enhancers. Here’s a snip:
In his book Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, Francis Fukuyama raises the broader issue of performance enhancement: The original purpose of medicine is to heal the sick, not turn healthy people into gods. He and others point out that increased use of such drugs could raise the standard of what is considered normal performance and widen the gap between those who have access to the medications and those who dont and even erode the relationship between struggle and the building of character.
Even though stimulants and other cognitive enhancers are intended for legitimate clinical use, history predicts that greater availability will lead to an increase in diversion, misuse and abuse, wrote Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and James Swanson of the University of California at Irvine, in a letter to Nature. Among high school students, abuse of prescription medications is second only to cannabis use.
But others insist that the ethics are not so clear, and that academic performance is different in important ways from baseball, or cycling.
I think the analogy with sports doping is really misleading, because in sports its all about competition, only about whos the best runner or home run hitter, said Martha Farah, director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania. In academics, whether youre a student or a researcher, there is an element of competition, but its secondary. The main purpose is to try to learn things, to get experience, to write papers, to do experiments. So in that case if you can do it better because youve got some drug on board, that would on the face of things seem like a plus.
She and other midcareer scientists interviewed said that, as far as they knew, very few of their colleagues used brain-boosting drugs regularly. Many have used Provigil for jet lag, or even to stay vertical for late events. But most agreed that the next generation of scientists, now in graduate school and college, were more likely to use the drugs as study aids and bring along those habits as they moved up the ladder.
Earlier on blog.bioethics.net:
+ Is your professor juicing?