American Journal of Bioethics

uajb-1610_initial_v2_darker

October 2016
Healing Without Waging War: Beyond Military Metaphors in Medicine and HIV Cure Research
Governance of Transnational Global Health Research Consortia and Health Equity
UAJB 16(9) copy

September 2016
Four Roles of Ethical Theory in Clinical Ethics Consultation
The Importance of Fostering Ownership During Medical Training
UAJB 16(8)_final

August 2016
The Curious Case of the De-ICD: Negotiating the Dynamics of Autonomy and Paternalism in Complex Clinical Relationships
IRB and Research Regulatory Delays Within the Military Health System: Do They Really Matter? And If So, Why and for Whom?
UAJB 16.7

July 2016
Withdrawing Versus Withholding Freedoms: Nudging and the Case of Tobacco Control
Moral Hazard in Pediatrics
UAJB16.6

June 2016
Clinical Trials Infrastructure as a Quality Improvement Intervention in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Not Just “Study Drugs” for the Rich: Stimulants as Moral Tools for Creating Opportunities for Socially Disadvantaged Students
UAJB 16(5)_final copy

May 2016
Biases and Heuristics in Decision Making and Their Impact on Autonomy
Aboriginal Health Care and Bioethics: A Reflection on the Teaching of the Seven Grandfathers
UAJB 16(4)_final copy

April 2016
Bioethicists Can and Should Contribute to Addressing Racism
An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs
UAJB 16(3)_final

March 2016
Ethics Consultation Quality Assessment Tool: A Novel Method for Assessing the Quality of Ethics Case Consultations Based on Written Records
A Pilot Evaluation of Portfolios for Quality Attestation of Clinical Ethics Consultants
UAJB 16(2)_Final copy

February 2016
Fetal Risks, Relative Risks, and Relatives' Risks
The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine
UAJB 16(1)_final copy

January 2016
Legal and Ethical Considerations in Allowing Parental Exemptions From Newborn Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD) Screening
Balancing Legitimate Critical-Care Interests: Setting Defensible Care Limits Through Policy Development